The conflict of interest lawsuit against Roger Binney has been dismissed. In an 11-page ruling, her Judge Vineet Sareen, ethics officer of the Indian Cricket Control Commission (BCCI), ruled that his Sanjeev Gupta’s allegations against the BCCI president were baseless and dismissed. He also issued a strong warning to petitioners.
The complaint concerns Vinnie’s daughter-in-law, Mayanti Langer, who allegedly has ties to BCCI broadcaster Star Sports. “I believe that Sanjeev Gupta’s allegations are baseless. Rule 38(2) does not apply in this case, as the applicant has not demonstrated the existence of a conflict of interest,” Judge Saleen said in her judgment.
He added: She hosts live broadcasts and panels for Star Sports. On April 5, 2018 and she announced on June 27, 2022 that the defendant (Binnie) was appointed to Star Sports as President because the fact that he was granted the media rights of the BCCI and IPL to Star Sports is also undisputed. You cannot claim to have given the media rights. It has influenced sports. Langer is not a Star Sports employee and works only as an anchor under contract with Star Sports. As no instance of a conflict of interest has been raised in her duties with Star Sports, it cannot be assumed that a conflict of interest existed or that the provisions of Rule (38)(1)(i) would apply. ”
The ethics officer also said that the mere existence of a relationship was not sufficient grounds for a conflict of positions. and the complainant must show how the relationship leads to a compromise in the defendant’s participation, performance, and performance “duty”, the verdict is an example of a similar case against Rahul Dravid. read by quoting
Regarding petitioners, Judge Sareen said: If so, it would be severely reviewed, including not considering the complaint itself.”